I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
一个数据是，2009 年平板电视销量占家电下乡彩电销量的比例达 47%，其中第四季度，平板电视销量占比已达到 62%。，推荐阅读谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】获取更多信息
Here’s how to build a customer-funded startup and grow on your own terms before bringing investors to the table.，推荐阅读Line官方版本下载获取更多信息
13:13, 27 февраля 2026Мир